<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Pro News &#187; Andy Beal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetpronews.com/author/andy-beal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetpronews.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:31:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adds New Music Search To The Mix</title>
		<link>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/11/02/google-adds-new-music-search-to-the-mix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/11/02/google-adds-new-music-search-to-the-mix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 12:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetpronews.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What’s the name of that song? You know the one. They play it a lot at NC State football games? C’mon, you know it. “Boom, here comes the boom….” No? Forget it! I’ll Google it instead! Yes, that’s it! And, pretty soon, you’ll never have problems finding a song, artist, or album again–thanks to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s the name of that song?</p>
<p>You know the one. They play it a lot at NC State football games?</p>
<p>C’mon, you know it. “Boom, here comes the boom….”</p>
<p>No?</p>
<p>Forget it! I’ll Google it instead!</p>
<p><span id="more-75"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;esrch=MusicOneboxDemoOptin%3A%3ALaunchDemoOptIn&amp;q=boom+here+comes+the+boom&amp;aq=0&amp;oq=boom+here&amp;aqi=g10"><img style="border: 1px solid black; margin: 5px;" src="http://images.ientrymail.com/internetpronews/images/Screen-shot-2009-10-29-at-9.38.15-AM.png" alt="" border="1" height="380" width="400"></a></p>
<p>Yes, that’s it!</p>
<p>And, pretty soon, you’ll never have problems finding a song, artist, or album again–thanks to <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/making-search-more-musical.html">a new “Discover Music” onebox</a> from Google.</p>
<blockquote><p>Maybe you remember only the chorus — or maybe you remember who sang it, but you forgot the exact name of the song. If you’ve ever heard a catchy song in a car or cafe, but just can’t figure out the name of the song, you’ll know what I’m talking about. This search feature also helps you find many of those songs by entering a search containing a line or two of lyrics.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Cool, huh? Google has partnered with MySpace and Lala to source the results and Pandora, imeem, and Rhapsody are standing by to help you discover music related to your query. Not only does the Onebox show the result, but you can click the play button to activate the pop-up–and play the song!</p>
<p align="center"><em>**Time out! Google is allowing pop-ups now? That’s the topic for a another blog post!**</em></p>
<p>If you’re not seeing the results yet, Google has launched a <a href="http://www.google.com/landing/music/">music search</a> site you can try out.</p>
<p>The only thing missing? Maybe a partnership with <a href="http://www.shazam.com/music/web/pages/getshazam.html">Shazam</a>, so I can play music to Google and have it recognize it–without me knowing anything about the song. That would be cool!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/10/google-hits-a-high-note-with-new-music-onebox.html">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/11/02/google-adds-new-music-search-to-the-mix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows Online Users Seldom Trust &#8220;Internet&#8221; Friends</title>
		<link>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/07/13/study-shows-online-users-seldom-trust-internet-friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/07/13/study-shows-online-users-seldom-trust-internet-friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetpronews.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like a new report on social media marketing is released weekly. Today, we see a new report from Razorfish–which surely must help with its attempts to find a knight in shining armor. Aside from Razorfish’s creation of a new Social Influence Marketing (SIM) Score–which measures the reach and sentiment of your brand in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like a new report on social media marketing is released weekly. Today, we see a new report from <a href="http://www.razorfish.com/">Razorfish</a>–which surely must help with its <a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/06/is-microsoft-ready-to-shave-off-razorfishs-conflict-of-interest.html">attempts</a> to find a knight in shining armor.</p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span></p>
<p>Aside from Razorfish’s creation of a new Social Influence Marketing (SIM) Score–which measures the reach and sentiment of your brand in social media–there’s nothing earth-shattering contained in the <em>Fluent</em> report.</p>
<p>Except, perhaps, this:</p>
<p><strong>76% of the 1,000 consumers polled, said they trust their <span style="text-decoration: underline;">offline</span> friends when making a product purchase decision. Compare that to just 33% who say they trust their <span style="text-decoration: underline;">online</span> friends!</strong></p>
<p>Clearly, this demonstrates that while social networks might encourage us all to be one big friendly social network, we’re clinging to our old-school definition of <em>friend.</em> It’s somewhat encouraging to see that we’re not collectively being duped into believing that when we add someone as a &#8220;friend&#8221; we’re instantly BFFs.</p>
<p>More startling is we trust our online friends less than we trust TV ads, social network ads, or online reviews. In fact, <strong>we barely trust the opinions of our online friends more than we trust banner ads!</strong></p>
<p>This chart sums-up our trust:</p>
<p><img style="margin: 5px;" alt="" src="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Picture-13.png" height="261" width="424"></p>
<p>You can <a href="http://www.goingsocialnow.com/2009/07/launching-fluent-the-social-in.html?mp">read the full report here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketingpilgrim.com/2009/07/only-33-of-us-trust-our-online-friends-barely-more-than-trust-in-banner-ads.html">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internetpronews.com/2009/07/13/study-shows-online-users-seldom-trust-internet-friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

